| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Cpt Branko
Beyond Divinity Inc
Beyond Virginity
   |
Posted - 2009.09.13 11:03:00 -
[1]
Why are we talking about recharge and PVP and HAM Drake in the same sentence?
A PVP Drake has 3 BCUs and relies on buffer rather then recharge to win. It also tends to beat preety much any BC out there bar slaved trimarked Harbingers in pure DPS/tank terms while fitting tackle.
A Brutix is going to die to it, unless it has ECM drones and extreme luck.
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |
Cpt Branko
Beyond Divinity Inc
Beyond Virginity
|
Posted - 2009.09.14 14:09:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: Kovorix
A properly fit drake with HAMs, 2-3 BCUs, and a buffer is an excellent pvp ship. But 1v1, I would still take it on most of the time in a brutix. Your idea that you will be able to keep a brutix in HAM range but outside of web/scram range is ridiculous, you will be tackled and the brutix will be on your face.
Only small problem is beating the said Drake in Brutix optimal range tbh.
Maybe shield neutron brutix with ecms and a bit of luck.
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |
Cpt Branko
Beyond Divinity Inc
Beyond Virginity
|
Posted - 2009.09.17 01:47:00 -
[3]
Edited by: Cpt Branko on 17/09/2009 01:48:47
Originally by: Darthewok
Of course, since OP is Gallente, he must as well fly Taranis (the highest-DPS interceptor in the game) instead of BCs for solo PVP as it is much better suited for it. BCs IMO are more for gang work than solo
Lies 
Cheap to lose, yeah, dies in most camps, but much wider target selection.
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |
Cpt Branko
Beyond Divinity Inc
Beyond Virginity
|
Posted - 2009.09.17 07:19:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Raa Chura
My pvp setup gives 686 tank vs kin/therm and it's a universal setups.
One of those no-tackle, no speed mods, low DPS setups?
Sig removed, inappropriate link. If you would like further details please mail [email protected] ~Saint |
| |
|